{"id":3622,"date":"2019-05-10T16:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-05-10T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2020-07-30T16:16:05","modified_gmt":"2020-07-30T21:16:05","slug":"april-sales-down-in-month-with-no","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/2019\/05\/10\/april-sales-down-in-month-with-no\/","title":{"rendered":"April sales down in a month with no Action #1000; Marvel releases twice as many comics as DC"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n
\"<\/span><\/div>\n

There’s a lot of things that make the aggregate numbers in the distributor sales charts swing up and down; the shipping calendar is the one we note here the most, as comparing five-shipping-week months with four-week ones always gives a distorted picture. Add to that list blockbuster anniversary issues, which, in the case of last year’s Amazing Spider-Man<\/em> #800<\/a><\/strong> and last month’s Detective Comics<\/em> #1000<\/a><\/strong>, have dollar sales large enough to move the market on their own. (EDIT<\/b>: Before the day was out, that list grew with the announcement of Marvel Comics #1000<\/a><\/b>\u00a0in August.)<\/i><\/p>\n

So, too, do we see swings later on when we compare months without such books \u2014 and that’s a big part of what happened in April, as the month’s $37.75 million in comics and graphic novel sales to comics shops represented a sharp drop from last April’s Action Comics<\/em> #1000<\/a><\/strong>-fortified total. The top sellers are below; the full estimates will appear here<\/a><\/b> on Monday.<\/p>\n

Action<\/em> #1000 alone isn’t enough to explain the difference, however, and the contributing factor there is one we’ve talked about a lot lately: DC just isn’t publishing many comics. Back in December, DC<\/b> released just 52 comic books, its lowest number in any month since 1991; the holiday-truncated month was partially the cause of that. Last month, DC matched that number with no holidays in the mix; its 52 new periodical releases were 29 fewer than April 2018. Marvel<\/b>, meanwhile, took up the slack again, releasing 106 comic books, 20 more than last April<\/a> <\/b>and its highest number since June 2016, before the 2017 slowdown began.<\/p>\n

That’s right: Marvel released more than twice as many new comic books than DC did in April.<\/b> That has never happened in the six years since Diamond’s been publishing new release counts \u2014 nor does Marvel appear to have doubled DC’s number of entries in the Top 300 charts at any point since at least 1996. The only time we can definitely say it happened before was in 1974, when DC’s line had shrunk and Marvel was practically blowing it off the newsstands, publishing dozens more titles (including more than 20 monthly comics featuring just reprints, mostly horror).<\/p>\n

Interestingly, it has<\/i><\/b> occurred in recent memory in the other direction: when Marvel reduced the size of its line after its bankruptcy, DC more than doubled Marvel’s periodical output several times; March 2000<\/a><\/b> saw DC chart 98 new comic books versus Marvel’s 41. (It was also a historically bad time for sales overall, though it appears that Marvel did not simply expand its way out of that crisis: per-release sales appear to have improved before line size increases took place.)<\/p>\n

\"<\/span><\/div>\n

DC’s number of new graphic novel offerings, 32, went up by two versus last April, while Marvel’s remained the same; it’s the other publishers whose output shrank considerably. Only 275 new graphic novels were offered to market, down 22% year-over-year. Image published 22 new graphic novels last April; 13 last month. IDW went from 19 to 9.<\/p>\n

How do these differing strategies measure up? Marvel’s overall dollar sales to the market, aided by the chart-topping War of the Realms <\/i>#1<\/a><\/b>, were almost exactly even year-over-year \u2014 significantly better than the overall market, but requiring more new releases to get there. DC, meanwhile, was down quite a lot, although again last year’s Action<\/em> #1000 accounts for a big chunk of the comparative shortfall. Excising that one title from the 2018 mix, DC is still behind year-over-year, but (as we saw before in February) not by as much as we might expect given the reduction in release slate size.<\/p>\n

DC had announced it was going to be publishing fewer periodicals, and there’s no doubt it’s happened; in the last six months it’s released 383 new comics, versus 517 from November 2017 to April 2018. That’s a drop of more than 25%, and cannot be discounted when looking at overall unit sales; when the #2 bestselling publisher goes from releasing 20 books a week to 14 or 15 (or 13, as happened last month) that’s bound to show up various places in the charts.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
\"See<\/span><\/div>\n

There was also an Avengers<\/i><\/b> movie out in April; rumor is it did some business. Its impact can be seen in the comics charts via Thanos<\/i> #1<\/a><\/b>, which ranked sixth in dollars and seventh in units, but the greater effect was on graphic novels, where the Infinity War Omnibus<\/a><\/i><\/b>, the Infinity by Starlin and Hickman Omnibus<\/a><\/i><\/b>, and the $500 Avengers Earth’s Mightiest Box Set Slipcase<\/a><\/i><\/b> all made the top five in dollars.<\/p>\n

I was asked this week why movies don’t seem to more obviously drive comics sales; I answered that they do, but what they seem to help most is the source-material graphic novels where retailers can more easily and lucratively focus newcomers’ attention.<\/p>\n

April’s orders bring the year-to-date orders close to $161 million, just slightly better than even with the same period in 2018; May was one of the two best months of the year last year and part of a string of months topping $40 million, so the market will need to improve on its April pace to keep up. Last May saw the DC line reduction starting in earnest, so at least that publisher’s comparatives should be somewhat closer.<\/p>\n

The comparative sales statistics:<\/strong><\/p>\n