{"id":5357,"date":"2010-11-16T21:57:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-16T21:57:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2020-08-01T17:44:44","modified_gmt":"2020-08-01T22:44:44","slug":"x-men-1-one-piece-and-world-records","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/2010\/11\/16\/x-men-1-one-piece-and-world-records\/","title":{"rendered":"X-Men #1, One Piece, and world records"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: right;\"><i><span style=\"font-size: small; font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;\">by John Jackson Miller, with special thanks to T.M. Haley<\/span><\/span><\/i><\/div>\n<p><a style=\"clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Guinness-World-Records-2011\/dp\/190499458X?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=farawaypcom-20&amp;link_code=bil&amp;camp=213689&amp;creative=392969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ws.amazon.com\/widgets\/q?MarketPlace=US&amp;ServiceVersion=20070822&amp;ID=AsinImage&amp;WS=1&amp;Format=_SL160_&amp;ASIN=190499458X&amp;tag=farawaypcom-20\" alt=\"Guinness World Records 2011\" \/><\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: medium none ! important; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 0px ! important;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=farawaypcom-20&amp;l=bil&amp;camp=213689&amp;creative=392969&amp;o=1&amp;a=190499458X\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" \/>One of the events you may have missed from <b>Comic-Con International<\/b> in 2010 was that the <i><b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Guinness-World-Records-2011\/dp\/190499458X?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=farawaypcom-20&amp;link_code=btl&amp;camp=213689&amp;creative=392969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Guinness Book of World Records<\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: medium none ! important; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 0px ! important;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=farawaypcom-20&amp;l=btl&amp;camp=213689&amp;creative=392969&amp;o=1&amp;a=190499458X\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" \/><\/b><\/i> added Marvel Comics to its latest edition for publishing the best-selling comic book of all time: <b><i>X-Men<\/i> Vol. 2, #1<\/b>, with its five variant covers in 1991. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.comicmix.com\/news\/2010\/07\/22\/sdcc-guinness-book-awards-x-men-1-highest-selling-comic\/\"><b>A ceremony was held at the event<\/b><\/a>, with writer <b>Chris Claremont<\/b> in attendance. (Marvel has a video interview with the <i>Guinness<\/i> editor <a href=\"http:\/\/marvel.com\/news\/comicstories.13598.sdcc_2010%7Ecolon%7E_marvel_breaks_world_record\"><b>here<\/b><\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>The ranking of <b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/X-Men-October-1991-Chris-Claremont\/dp\/B000GGQLN8?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=farawaypcom-20&amp;link_code=btl&amp;camp=213689&amp;creative=392969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">X-Men Vol. 2, #1<\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: medium none ! important; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 0px ! important;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=farawaypcom-20&amp;l=btl&amp;camp=213689&amp;creative=392969&amp;o=1&amp;a=B000GGQLN8\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" \/><\/b> has been mentioned by me many times, here on the site and in my previous work for <i><b>Comics Buyer&#8217;s Guide<\/b><\/i>. The 8.1 million copy figure could even have come to their attention from one of my past reports, for all I know; I drew it from Marvel&#8217;s internal 1991 records, myself. Here are the breakdowns for how the issue sold:<\/p>\n<style>\ntable {  }td { padding-top: 1px; padding-right: 1px; padding-left: 1px; color: windowtext; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; font-family: Geneva; vertical-align: bottom; border: medium none; white-space: nowrap; }.xl22 { font-weight: 700; }.xl23 { font-weight: 700; text-align: center; }.xl24 { text-align: center; }.xl25 { font-weight: 700; text-align: center; }<br \/>\n<\/style>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse; width: 351px;\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"75\" \/>\n<col width=\"94\" \/>\n<col width=\"93\" \/>\n<col width=\"89\" \/> <\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"xl22\" width=\"75\" height=\"13\">ISSUE<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl23\" width=\"94\">Direct Market<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl23\" width=\"93\">Newsstand<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl23\" width=\"89\">TOTAL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td height=\"13\">1A<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">1,512,000<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">43,000<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">1,555,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td height=\"13\">1B<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">1,739,500<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">43,000<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">1,782,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td height=\"13\">1C<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">1,437,000<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">43,000<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">1,480,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td height=\"13\">1D<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">1,371,900<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">43,000<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">1,414,900<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td height=\"13\">1E<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">1,954,100<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">0<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\">1,954,100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"xl22\" height=\"13\">TOTAL #1<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl25\">8,014,500<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl25\">172,000<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl25\">8,186,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Within the direct market sales, <b>Capital City Distribution<\/b>&#8216;s sales of each edition ranged from 424,800 copies, for the Beast cover, to 332,800 copies for the Magneto cover: its overall sales were 1,874,100 copies, or 23.3% of all direct market sales. (There were a dozen different distributors selling to comics shops then). Note that there were no newsstand sales of the fifth cover. The newsstand draws of the issue in general are far lower than the normal newsstand\/direct market breakdowns seen in 1991; it&#8217;s apparent that the newsstand didn&#8217;t read the same demand for the new title that comics retailers did. The overall newsstand draws are about 60% above what <i><b>Uncanny X-Men<\/b><\/i>&#8216;s were at the time; I&#8217;m guessing that title was used as an ordering guide.<\/p>\n<p>All five versions of the issue (whose four covers combined to make the single image represented in the fifth, double gatefold cover edition) released in consecutive weeks of August 1991. There were also no subscription sales reported, as it was a brand new title. There is no American rival to <i>X-Men<\/i> #1 for this title; there are comic books in the 3-4 million copy range (like <i><b>X-Force<\/b><\/i> <b>#1<\/b>, only two months old when the &#8220;adjectiveless&#8221; X-Men title launched), but I know of nothing with numbers like these. (The reprinted issue has been collected <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shareasale.com\/r.cfm?u=296154&amp;b=188072&amp;m=8908&amp;afftrack=&amp;urllink=www%2Etfaw%2Ecom%2FProfile%2FX%2DMen%2DBy%2DClaremont%2DAnd%2DLee%2DOmnibus%2DHC%2DVol%2E%2D02%5F%5F%5F391173\"><b>here<\/b><\/a>.)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/goog_1029996404\"><br \/>\n<\/a><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/199108XMen1-1.jpg\" width=\"204\" height=\"320\" border=\"0\" \/><i>Guinness<\/i> would seem to be defining a comic book as a periodical magazine, as opposed to any other delivery system which contains comics content. That&#8217;s certainly in line with how the term has always been used in this country: <b><i>Watchmen<\/i> #1<\/b> is a comic book. <i><b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Watchmen-Alan-Moore\/dp\/1401219268?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=farawaypcom-20&amp;link_code=btl&amp;camp=213689&amp;creative=392969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Watchmen<\/a><\/b><\/i><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: medium none ! important; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 0px ! important;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=farawaypcom-20&amp;l=btl&amp;camp=213689&amp;creative=392969&amp;o=1&amp;a=1401219268\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" \/> is a collected edition \u2014 and it is also a graphic novel. One is on sale for a month. The other is on sale forever. This is a key distinction, when it comes to making sure we&#8217;re making apples-to-apples comparisons \u2014 and it is important when considering comparisons with international top-sellers such as <b><i>One Piece<\/i><\/b> and <i><b>Asterix<\/b><\/i> editions.<\/p>\n<p>Frequent mention is made in the trade press of the sales records of the Japanese manga series <i><b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/One-Piece-Vol-51-Supernovas\/dp\/1421534673?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=farawaypcom-20&amp;link_code=btl&amp;camp=213689&amp;creative=392969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">One Piece<\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: medium none ! important; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 0px ! important;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=farawaypcom-20&amp;l=btl&amp;camp=213689&amp;creative=392969&amp;o=1&amp;a=1421534673\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" \/><\/b><\/i>, which are spectacular indeed: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.animenewsnetwork.com\/news\/2010-11-10\/one-piece-manga-volume-60-sells-2-million+in-4-days\"><b>Anime News Network<\/b><\/a> reports that <b>Eiichiro Oda<\/b>&#8216;s latest edition, <i><b>One Piece Vol. 60<\/b><\/i>, sold more than 2 million copies in its first week of sales this month out of a record first printing of 3.4 million copies. All the volumes of the series have sales of more than 200 million copies combined.<\/p>\n<div class=\"separator\" style=\"clear: both; text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/OnePieceVol60-1.jpg\" width=\"212\" height=\"320\" border=\"0\" \/><\/div>\n<p>Those sales, however, are for the <b><i>tankouban<\/i><\/b>, the Japanese equivalent of the American collected edition or graphic novel.<i> <\/i>Like most American comics that are eventually collected, <i>One Piece<\/i> appears first in a magazine \u2014 although a magazine much different in size from American comic books. <i>One Piece<\/i><b><i> <\/i><\/b>is published serialized in the anthology magazine <i><b>Shonen Jump<\/b><\/i>, one of several &#8220;phone-book magazines&#8221; (other examples include <i><b>Nakayoski<\/b><\/i>, <i><b>Margaret<\/b><\/i>, and <i><b>Asuka<\/b><\/i>) collecting chapters of various ongoing works. Bulky and cheaply printed, these magazines tend to be viewed as more disposable, making tankouban more desirable. The Weekly <i>Shonen Jump<\/i> does sell in the millions of copies, but <a href=\"http:\/\/comipress.com\/article\/2007\/05\/06\/1923\"><b>seems to have peaked in the mid-1990s<\/b><\/a>, with the peak sales for a single issue being 6.53 million copies in 1995.<\/p>\n<p>I would tend to regard the &#8220;phone books&#8221; as a distinct delivery system from the traditional American comic-book-held-together-by-staples; they are, in many senses, books on their own. There have been American anthology monthlies \u2014 indeed, comics began as anthologies \u2014 but most topped out at 80 pages, and few have been seen in recent decades. But it is proper to say that <i>Shonen Jump<\/i> provides a somewhat closer comparison to <i>X-Men<\/i> Vol. 2, #1 than <i>One Piece<\/i> does \u2014 and there, <i>X-Men<\/i> #1 holds the edge.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, any given <i>One Piece<\/i> tankouban is more appropriately compared to sales of <i>Watchmen<\/i> and similar collected editions. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.comicbookresources.com\/?page=article&amp;id=24818\"><b>According to Brian Hibbs<\/b><\/a>, <i>Watchmen<\/i> sold 424,814 copies of its softcover collection in 2009 through just those stores that report to Nielsen&#8217;s <b> Bookscan<\/b>; while its all-time sales are higher still, it&#8217;s probably safe to assume that with <i>One Piece<\/i>&#8216;s first printings so monumental, there are individual <i>tankouban<\/i> in those 60 volumes that have outsold it over time.<\/p>\n<p>I think the takeaway is that <i>One Piece<\/i>, as a tankouban, stands a good chance to be the international record-holder when it comes to bound-edition bookshelf comics (without undertaking an exhaustive survey of all European and Japanese comics, I can&#8217;t go farther than that), while <i>X-Men <\/i>Vol. 2, #1 very likely holds the worldwide title when it comes to periodical newsrack comics with staples.<\/p>\n<p>An interesting question is how comparisons can be made series-wide. If individual <i>tankouban<\/i> can&#8217;t be compared to individual comic books, how does <i>One Piece<\/i> as a 200-million-copy selling series stack up against other series historically? Or its sales of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nt2099.com\/J-ENT\/news\/manga-news-reviews\/one-piece-japanese-best-selling-manga-for-2009\/\"><b>14.7 million copies, series-wide<\/b><\/a>, in 2009?<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.blogger.com\/goog_848338608\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"separator\" style=\"clear: both; text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/Superman1-1.jpg\" border=\"0\" \/><\/div>\n<p>It&#8217;s difficult to say. You could certainly make the case that the weekly <i>Shonen Jump<\/i> over its lifespan has sold more copies; of course, since <i>One Piece<\/i> is in many issues of <i>Shonen Jump<\/i>, you&#8217;d wonder if it should be counted twice. There are also <a href=\"http:\/\/www.downthetubes.net\/writing_comics\/comics_facts_and_figures.html\"><b>extremely long-running British weeklies<\/b><\/a> whose sales over time would be considerable; there are other European titles you&#8217;d want to look at, too. But just comparing with series with a single star, we know that <i><b>Superman<\/b><\/i> sold in the 15-20 million range annually in the 1950s, and had sales in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.comichron.com\/titlespotlights\/superman.html\"><b>just the 1960-1986 years of more than 110 million copies<\/b><\/a>. All told, from 1939 to present, the title is almost certainly north of 200 million copies, if not 300 million \u2014 not counting all reprints of that material. And that&#8217;s where it gets\u00a0 pretty easy to get off into the weeds, trying to decide what should be counted. Foreign editions? Many Disney comics which began in the high-circulation 1940s and 1950s would be in the running. Heck, if we enlarge the comics definition, <i><b>Mad<\/b><\/i> was definitely having 25-30 million copy years for a while there in the heyday.<\/p>\n<p>An interesting, endlessly debatable topic for discussion \u2014 and the nice part is that is it reminds us of the potential reach of comics as a medium. To a degree, anyway: a huge portion of those <i>X-Men<\/i> comics were purchased not by readers, but speculators: one I&#8217;m aware of bought 5,000 copies, not realizing it would be the least scarce comic book of all time. I have 25 copies in my own collection, and I only bought one \u2014 I have no idea where the others came from!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by John Jackson Miller, with special thanks to T.M. Haley One of the events you may have missed from Comic-Con International in 2010 was that the Guinness Book of World Records added Marvel Comics to its latest edition for publishing the best-selling comic book of all time: X-Men Vol. 2, #1, with its five variant &#8230; <a title=\"X-Men #1, One Piece, and world records\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/2010\/11\/16\/x-men-1-one-piece-and-world-records\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about X-Men #1, One Piece, and world records\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":5358,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[98,46],"class_list":["post-5357","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-manga","tag-record-setters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5357","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5357"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5357\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6580,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5357\/revisions\/6580"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5357"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5357"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}