{"id":5619,"date":"2009-09-08T16:43:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-08T16:43:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2020-07-28T03:06:50","modified_gmt":"2020-07-28T03:06:50","slug":"when-first-dc-comic-hit-stands","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/2009\/09\/08\/when-first-dc-comic-hit-stands\/","title":{"rendered":"When the first DC comic hit the stands"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; WIDTH: 214px; FLOAT: right; HEIGHT: 296px; CURSOR: pointer\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5379137460846740514\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/09\/NewFunFront-1.jpg\" \/>After writing about the considerations that went into figuring out when <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.comichron.com\/2009\/08\/fixing-date-for-marvels-70th.html\"><span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\"><span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">Marvel Comics<\/span> #1 might have hit stands<\/span><\/a> \u2014 including a look at the file copy from <span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Jacquet Studios<\/span>, which produced the comic book \u2014 I received some interesting material from <span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Glen Cadigan<\/span> relating to an even earlier title \u2014 <span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">the first DC publication<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Major Malcolm Wheeler-Nicholson<\/span> launched what would later become DC with <span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">New Fun<\/span>, an oversized tabloid with black-and-white interiors not long after the monthly <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.comichron.com\/2009\/02\/comics-sales-in-1930s-famous-funnies.html\"><span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Famous Funnies<\/span><\/a> began. &#8220;As most people have forgotten,&#8221; Cadigan said, &#8220;not only was <span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Lloyd Jacquet<\/span> the original editor of the first Marvel comic ever published, but he was also the editor of the very first DC title, <span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\"><span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">New Fun <\/span>#1<\/span>, which has a cover date of February 1935.&#8221; Last year on eBay, he writes, a copy of <span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">New Fun<\/span> was sold \u2014 depicted here \u2014 that included the following letter from Jacquet:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"MARGIN: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; WIDTH: 263px; FLOAT: left; HEIGHT: 400px; CURSOR: pointer\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5379137709739557842\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/09\/NewFunLetter-1.jpg\" \/><span style=\"COLOR: rgb(0,0,153)\">1-11-35<br \/><\/span><span style=\"COLOR: rgb(0,0,153)\">New FUN \u2014 hot off The Daily Eagle press \u2014 goes on sale today from coast to coast. Take this copy home \u2014 try it on the youngsters from 2 to 90 \u2014 and see them go through this live, modern idea of a kid&#8217;s mag, filled with <\/span><span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,153)\">original<\/span><span style=\"COLOR: rgb(0,0,153)\"> comics and features!<\/span> <span style=\"COLOR: rgb(0,0,153)\"><br \/><\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: right\"><span style=\"COLOR: rgb(0,0,153)\"><span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">Lloyd Jacquet, Editor<\/span><\/span> <span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic; COLOR: rgb(0,0,153)\"><br \/>P.S. How do you like it?<\/span> <\/div>\n<p>Cadigan said he supposed the letter was written for retailers \u2014 but as he only saved the scans from the auction, he couldn&#8217;t refer back to the listing to see if it was any more specific as to the issue&#8217;s origin or its provenance. I would imagine Jacquet&#8217;s likely audience might also include colleagues in the publishing community; there might also be advertisers and distributors in the potential audience, if those contacts were inside Jacquet&#8217;s domain to handle for Wheeler-Nicholson.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In any event,&#8221; Cadigan wrote, &#8220;it gives a specific day for the shipping date of <span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">New Fun<\/span> #1 (1-11-35), which is either less than a month or about a month-and-a-half from the cover date, depending upon whether February means the first or last day of the month.&#8221; I would assume that is indeed January 11 and not the international November 1 \u2014 though both days would have been Fridays in 1935.<\/p>\n<p>Another mystery is what&#8217;s written on the cover of the issue \u2014 Cadigan made out words which might be &#8220;Better Boston&#8221; or &#8220;Batter Barton&#8221; on top, but the two words below are even less clear. It&#8217;s not obvious that they&#8217;re from the same hand as the accompanying letter.<\/p>\n<p>So what does it say about when the issue hit the stands? Cadigan notes that something else to look at is that Timely may have had different business practises than National did in 1935, and five years later things may have been different across the board. &#8220;But in 1935, the same man that packaged <span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">Marvel Comics<\/span> # 1 put a February cover date on a book that was printed in January, so it&#8217;s something to consider.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a very interesting data point \u2014 if there&#8217;s more information as to the background of thin interesting letter and issue, I&#8217;d love to hear it. And, just as with the Pay Copy<span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\"> <\/span>of<span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\"> Marvel<\/span> #1, it adds its own set of variables. Did the printing press send Jacquet his copy of <span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">New Fun<\/span> at the same time it shipped to the newsstand? Or did it ship Jacquet his copy earlier, in which case we\u2019re awful close to that February issue coming out in February, against known later newsstand practices. But maybe that logic hadn\u2019t been established yet. Either way, yeah, were looking at a comic in his hand pretty close to the cover date.<\/p>\n<p>The <span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">Marvel <\/span>Pay Copy continues to be the real wild card in this. The July dates are payment dates; that\u2019s pretty clear. But was Jacquet or his associate going through an issue they had in hand and marking checks as they sent them \u2014 meaning they had the comic book in July \u2014 or were they using the file copy later on as a double-check, just making sure once the issue is in hand that everyone\u2019s gotten their money? Because <span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">those<\/span> dates could have been written at any time, August, September, or October.<\/p>\n<p>There is another concern that comes out of seeing a publisher start from a one-month gap and go to a two- or three-month gap, because it means we\u2019re doubling up on issues at some point on the true monthlies. If we\u2019ve got&#8230;<\/p>\n<div style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: center\">Jan ship, Feb cover<br \/>Feb ship, Mar cover<br \/>Mar ship, Apr cover<\/div>\n<p>&#8230;and we somehow go to what we had later&#8230;<\/p>\n<div style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: center\">Jan ship, Apr cover<br \/>Feb ship, May cover<br \/>Mar ship, Jun cover<\/div>\n<p>&#8230;then we\u2019ve got months where two comic books coming out, and they just kept advancing the cover date. Now, this is common practice for magazine publishers, slipping a 13th issue into the year and advancing cover dates (as opposed to inserting a \u201cSummer\u201d issue\u201d or whatever). The ship-date-to-cover-date gap grows, but you\u2019d only know when the shift happened by recording every arrival date. Particularly if issues are released on a four-week system, an added 13th issue would be imperceptible.<\/p>\n<p>But it does create challenges if we&#8217;re trying to figure out when certain historic issues actually shipped. This is side project #24 here at Comichron, but there does seem to be enough information out there to at least sketch out a skeletal framework of the changing shipping-versus-cover date gaps for each publisher across time.<\/p>\n<p>As <span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Ron Goulart<\/span> writes in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/193311231X?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=farawaypcom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=193311231X\"><span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Comic Book Culture<\/span><\/a>, money was an issue for Major Wheeler-Nicholson on <span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">New Fun<\/span>, and &#8220;he often didn&#8217;t get around to paying his artists the small fees \u2014 usually five dollars per page \u2014 he&#8217;d promised them.&#8221; <span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Lloyd Jacquet<\/span> himself quit after months of non-payment, as did his successors <span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Sheldon Stark<\/span> and cartoonist <span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Whitney Ellsworth<\/span>, <span style=\"FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Gerard Jones<\/span> writes in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0465036570?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=farawaypcom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0465036570\"><span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-WEIGHT: bold\">Men of Tomorrow<\/span><\/a>. Maybe a Pay Copy of <span style=\"FONT-STYLE: italic\">New Fun<\/span> would have come in handy for the major \u2014 especially if it were valued at today&#8217;s prices!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After writing about the considerations that went into figuring out when Marvel Comics #1 might have hit stands \u2014 including a look at the file copy from Jacquet Studios, which produced the comic book \u2014 I received some interesting material from Glen Cadigan relating to an even earlier title \u2014 the first DC publication. Major &#8230; <a title=\"When the first DC comic hit the stands\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/2009\/09\/08\/when-first-dc-comic-hit-stands\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about When the first DC comic hit the stands\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":5620,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[4,107],"class_list":["post-5619","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-dc-comics","tag-golden-age"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5619"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5619\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5622,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5619\/revisions\/5622"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5620"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/comichron.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}